Original Sin and inherited depravity
The nature of sin is not that we fail to succeed in being equal to God, it is the failure to ascend to the capacity that we are able as human beings.
Sin is a choice, an avoidable choice, through the
grace of God. If it is avoidable, then we are accountable. Sin as
an act of the will is to be separated from sins of
ignorance, or mistakes. With the exception of including
"ignorance" as a sin that always carries the same damaging
effect as willful sin, the following definitions seems to follow along with the
points of this article.
So what is original sin and inherited
depravity that everyone talks about?
Original Sin. The Scriptures teach that the presence of
death in the world, with all its attendant evils, is due to man's sin.
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and
death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (For
until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no
law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not
sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him
that was to come....For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more
they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall
reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.) Therefore as by the offence of one
judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one
the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life (Rom. 5: 12-14, 17, 18).
Here
it is clearly taught that before of Adam, there was neither sin nor death;
after his fall, there were both, and these are regarded as the direct
consequences of sin. It seems clear also from this statement that natural evil
is the consequence of moral evil, for death is by sin.
inherited Depravity.
Not only are all men born under the penalty of death, as a consequence of
Adam's sin, but they are born with a depraved nature also, which m
contradistinction to the legal aspect of penalty, is generally termed inbred
sin or inherited depravity. This is defined in the language of the creed as
""that corruption of the nature of all the offspring of Adam, by
reason of which every one is very far gone from original righteousness"
(Article V).
Original
Sin or Inherited Depravity are terms applied to the subjective moral state or
condition of man by birth, and therefore express the moral condition of man in
his natural estate. This depravity must not, however, be regarded as a physical
entity or any other form of essential existence added to man's nature. It is
rather, as its name implies, a deprivation of loss.
The
doctrine of man's depravity rests upon the solid foundation of Scripture and
the universal testimony of human experience.
The
doctrine has never been seriously denied in the Church, except by the Pelagians
and the Socinians. Justin (A.D. 165) says, "Every race knows that
adultery, and murder, and such like are sinful: and though they all commit such
practices, they cannot escape from the knowledge that they act unrighteously
whenever they do so."
Also
we have Tertullian (200) who laid down the theory of natural depravity, which
seems closely connected with his views about the traduction of souls. He is
generally looked upon as the author of the doctrine of "Original
Sin," which he formulates as follows: "There is, besides the evil
which comes on the soul from the intervention of the evil spirits, an
antecedent, and in some sense natural, evil which arises from its corrupt
origin."
Even
when we look from a rational perspective, we will find that if we believe in Traducianism,
where mankind is able to create people in their image, this means that it is
their full image with all the problems and benefits, and one of these problems is
depravity. When we look at kids how they do things that their parents do even
if they have never seen their parents we will be amazed of how people can inherit
not only physical traits but even moral ones.
We
need to learn how to deal with the applications of this today as we believe
that we still have a choice to apply the sin or not; we have the chance to stop
the cycle of sin in humanity by choosing not to sin. As professor Bill Ury said
in his lecture on Hamartiology: “Adam started it, but he transmitted it! We
have free will to extend it or to stop it.”
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Crippen, T.G.. Popular Introduction to the History of Christian
Doctrine. (Sydney: Wentworth Press, 2016).
2. Wiley,
H. Orton. Christian Theology. (Missouri: Beacon Hill Press
of Kansas City, 1940).
3. The
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia revised. Geoffrey W. Bromiley editor, (Grand
Rapids, MI.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988).
Comments
Post a Comment